MCP HeartbeatTHE MCP OBSERVATORY
Public workspace

Explore

Evidence for your next connection.

Independent measurements of remote MCP servers. Every observation has a timestamp.

Read-only probes

MCP server · Other

Digital Experts Hypotheses

Open data: 1,590 JTBD hypotheses with cold-traffic test results and cost per lead. CC BY 4.0

Checks passed
11 / 22

3 failed · 8 not measured

Median response
96 ms

Median of successful probes over 7 days

30-day uptime
Not measured

Share of countable probes over 30 days, including daily rollups. Auth challenges are excluded.

Discovered tools
5

Tool definitions returned by this server

Independent monitoring

Health & checks

Status history

Outdated check

Last connection measurement is over 24 hours old. Current availability is unknown.

Last checked
Check summary by test group
Test areaPassedFailedUnmeasured
ConnectionCan a client connect and discover tools?
500
Reliability & speedDoes it respond consistently and quickly?
004
Access & authenticationWhat is required to use this server?
102
Tool qualityAre the tool definitions usable by an agent?
220
Publisher identityCan the publisher be traced to its source?
312

Unmeasured means there is not enough evidence to decide. How these checks work

Inspect individual checks 22 recorded

Core

  • Pass
    Reachable

    Latest probe returned HTTP 200 in 96 ms.

  • Pass
    Valid handshake

    protocolVersion 2025-11-25, serverInfo.name digital-experts-hypotheses.

  • Pass
    Lists tools

    tools/list returned 5 tools.

  • Pass
    Current protocol

    Negotiated 2025-11-25. The bar is 2025-06-18 or newer.

  • Pass
    HTTPS

    The endpoint URL is https.

Performance

  • Not measured
    Fast (p50)

    Median latency 96 ms over 1 samples in 7 days. The bar is 1000 ms. Need at least 5 samples.

  • Not measured
    Consistent (p95)

    95th percentile 96 ms over 1 samples in 7 days. The bar is 3000 ms. Need at least 20 samples.

  • Not measured
    Reliable (uptime)

    1 of 1 attempts returned a tool list in 30 days (100%). The bar is 99%. Need at least 30 samples.

  • Not measured
    Stable tool list

    Fewer than two successful probes in 30 days, so tool-list stability is not measured.

Access

  • Pass
    Open access

    tools/list succeeded with no credential, and the record declares none.

  • Not measured
    Standard auth

    Auth is not required, so the OAuth metadata check does not apply.

  • Not measured
    Free tier cited

    No publisher quote has been checked.

Tools

  • Pass
    Tools described

    Every tool description is at least 20 characters.

  • Pass
    Valid input schemas

    Every inputSchema is a JSON Schema object.

  • Fail
    Parameters documented

    6 of 9 parameters have a description (67%). The bar is 80%.

  • Fail
    Safety hints

    5 tools set neither readOnlyHint nor destructiveHint.

Publisher

  • Pass
    Verified namespace

    Listed in the Official MCP Registry.

  • Pass
    Website matches publisher

    The website host matches the reverse-domain namespace.

  • Fail
    Source repo linked

    No repository URL is on file.

  • Not measured
    Repo owner matches

    This namespace is not an io.github login, so the owner comparison does not apply.

  • Pass
    Recently updated

    Updated 2026-09-11T21:56:29.863621Z, within 180 days.

  • Not measured
    Open-source licence

    No GitHub repository to ask about a licence.

Start using Digital Experts Hypotheses

Connect to this server

Choose your client, copy the configuration, then enable the server in your client’s MCP settings.

Run this command in your terminal, then restart Claude Code.

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http digital-experts-hypotheses https://mcp.digitalexperts.tv/mcp

Capabilities

Tools 5

get_hypothesis

Full card of one hypothesis or test-wave summary by id (e.g. 'h-22788a'): job story, audience, offer, creative text, budget, metrics, conclusion, plus a ready-made citation sentence and source_url. Quote the citation with the link.

Discovered
list_niches

All 18 niches of the Digital Experts hypotheses base with counts (hypotheses, tested, worked) and medians (cost per subscriber, cost per lead, USD) over tested hypotheses. Start here to pick a niche. Data: CC BY 4.0, cite Digital Experts.

Discovered
methodology

Methodology of the Digital Experts base: where hypotheses come from, how a $50–500 exploratory test is run, what is measured, how verdicts are made, limitations and license. Read before interpreting the numbers.

Discovered
niche_stats

Summary of one niche: hypotheses, tested, worked, medians of cost per subscriber and per lead (USD), test budget, years, plus the 10 cheapest-lead tested hypotheses. niche = slug or Russian name (e.g. 'biznes-prodazhi' or 'Бизнес').

Discovered
search_hypotheses

Full-text search over hypothesis titles, job stories, offers, creatives and audiences with filters. Returns compact rows (id, title, niche, year, cost per subscriber/lead, verdict, source_url). Use get_hypothesis(id) for the full card. Query in Russian works best (the base is in Russian).

Discovered

Recent measurements

Probe history

View status
Latest stored probes. Raw probe rows are kept for 14 days.
CheckedResultResponseTools
Connected96 ms5