Responded15 / 22 checks passed
CitedBy
citedby.euVerified
Check a page, AI-crawler access, llms.txt and backlinks of a site. Free, read-only.
- Passed: Handshake
- Passed: Tools listed
- Passed: Updated recently
Median latency 60 ms · Last checked
Independent monitoring
Health & checks
Outdated check
Last connection measurement is over 24 hours old. Current availability is unknown.
Last checked| Test area | Passed | Failed | Unmeasured |
|---|---|---|---|
ConnectionCan a client connect and discover tools? | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Reliability & speedDoes it respond consistently and quickly? | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Access & authenticationWhat is required to use this server? | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Tool qualityAre the tool definitions usable by an agent? | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Publisher identityCan the publisher be traced to its source? | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Unmeasured means there is not enough evidence to decide. How these checks work
Inspect individual checks 22 recorded
Core
- Pass
- Pass
- Pass
- Pass
- Pass
Performance
- Not measured
- Not measured
- Not measured
- Not measured
Access
- Pass
- Not measured
- Not measured
Tools
- Pass
- Pass
- Pass
- Pass
Publisher
- Pass
- Pass
- Fail
- Not measured
- Pass
- Not measured
Start using PageCritic
Connect to this server
Choose your client, copy the configuration, then enable the server in your client’s MCP settings.
Run this command in your terminal, then restart Claude Code.
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http pagecritic https://pagecritic.app/mcpCapabilities
Tools 3
audit_landing_page
Loads a public landing page in a real browser (desktop and mobile), and returns a conversion score from 0 to 100, seven sub-scores (clarity, value proposition, CTA, trust, design, mobile, SEO basics), the top 3 issues with concrete fixes, what already works, a short AI-readiness score, and fix_prompt: a Markdown prompt that hands the fixes to a coding agent such as Claude Code or Cursor. Use it when someone wants feedback on why a homepage, landing page or pricing page does not convert, wants a second opinion before a launch, or wants to compare their page with a competitor's. Do not use it for pages behind a login, for non-HTML files, or for general SEO keyword research. It takes 30 to 90 seconds; if it returns status "running", call get_audit_result with the audit_id. The free result is complete on its own. The full report (every other issue ranked by the points it costs, the 36-check list, 3 headline and 3 CTA rewrites, 5 quick wins, mobile review, full AI-readiness fixes) costs $5 USD one-time, paid by a human at report_url. Set language to "pt" for a report in Brazilian Portuguese. A URL audited through the API in the last 24 hours (in the same language) returns that same result. Limit: 5 new audits per hour per client, 20 with an API key. With an API key that has credits (Authorization: Bearer header; 10 full reports for $29, see https://pagecritic.app/developers), the result includes the full report.
Discoveredcheck_ai_readiness
Fetches a public page as a normal browser and as GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, Claude-User and PerplexityBot, then reports which AI bots are blocked or get a challenge page, the robots.txt rule for each AI bot, how much text is visible without JavaScript, JSON-LD types, sitemap, Markdown versions and llms.txt, with a 0-100 score and prioritized fixes. Use it when someone asks whether ChatGPT, Claude or Perplexity can see or cite their site, or why their site does not show up in AI answers. Do not use it to judge design or copy (use audit_landing_page). It uses plain HTTP fetches, takes about 5-15 seconds, and is free (15 checks per hour per client).
Discoveredget_audit_result
Returns the current result of an audit started with audit_landing_page, by its audit_id. Use it only when audit_landing_page returned status "running"; wait about 20 seconds between calls. Returns the same fields as audit_landing_page.
DiscoveredRecent measurements
Probe history
| Checked | Result | Response | Tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connected | 694 ms | 3 |