Findings on what compounds and supplements do in the body, with evidence strength, quote and paper.
- Passed: Handshake
- Passed: Tools listed
- Passed: Updated recently
Median latency 699 ms · Last checked
Explore
Evidence for your next connection.
Independent measurements of remote MCP servers. Every observation has a timestamp.
Read-only probesMCP server · Other
China A-share filings: why a number moved, does the trend continue, who supplies whom.
1 failed · 7 not measured
Median of successful probes over 7 days
Share of countable probes over 30 days, including daily rollups. Auth challenges are excluded.
Tool definitions returned by this server
Independent monitoring
Responded
The server completed its last measured handshake. This is an observation, not a guarantee.
Last checked| Test area | Passed | Failed | Unmeasured |
|---|---|---|---|
ConnectionCan a client connect and discover tools? | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Reliability & speedDoes it respond consistently and quickly? | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Access & authenticationWhat is required to use this server? | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Tool qualityAre the tool definitions usable by an agent? | 3 | 1 | 0 |
Publisher identityCan the publisher be traced to its source? | 4 | 0 | 2 |
Unmeasured means there is not enough evidence to decide. How these checks work
Start using WalnutLink A-share Depth Desk
Choose your client, copy the configuration, then enable the server in your client’s MCP settings.
Run this command in your terminal, then restart Claude Code.
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http walnutlink-a-share-depth-desk https://walnutlink.ai/mcpCapabilities
Retrieve a research result by the id that a_share_deep_research returned. Call this to check whether the human-reviewed answer is ready, or to fetch the full text once it is. Answers take minutes to hours because a filed report is read first; while it is still queued the tool returns the queue position, not a guess. Use this instead of opening the public page when you are an automated client that cannot render HTML.
DiscoveredUse when the user asks HOW two Chinese companies relate: who supplies whom, who competes with whom, who owns equity in whom, or whether an acquisition target overlaps with the acquirer's product line. Every relationship returned carries a verbatim quote from a filed document (annual report, prospectus, restructuring draft, related-party announcement) and a confidence tag: primary = the filing says it outright, secondary = broker or media, inferred = our deduction with no direct textual proof. Unlisted companies work as inputs too, which matters for acquisition targets. If the pair has not been researched it says so plainly instead of guessing - absence of a record is not evidence of no relationship. Do NOT call this for prices, valuation or index levels.
DiscoveredUse when the user asks WHY something happened or WHAT it means for a Chinese listed company: a margin moved, a policy landed, an industry chain shifted, two companies diverge, or what management actually said on the record. This desk does NOT serve quotes, price checks or valuation snapshots - that is commodity data available everywhere, and answering it would waste your turn. What it does: reads the filed report, the IR transcript and the disclosure wording, then answers in numbers. Returns a vetted answer immediately if this question has been researched before; otherwise it returns the primary-source evidence it already holds plus an id for the human answer. Ask it the question you would ask a sell-side analyst, not the one you would type into a quote app.
DiscoveredRecent measurements
| Checked | Result | Response | Tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connected | 1732 ms | 3 | |
| Connected | 1674 ms | 3 |